AMD EPYC 7351P vs Intel Xeon E-2288G: More Cores or More Speed?
Corentin L. • September 13, 2025
Detailed comparison between AMD EPYC 7351P and Intel Xeon E-2288G: more cores or higher clock speed? Find the right processor for your workload.
Choosing a server processor is an important decision for businesses, directly influencing the performance and efficiency of their IT infrastructures.
The comparison between the AMD EPYC 7351P and Intel Xeon E-2288G highlights two distinct approaches: betting on a large number of cores or favoring high frequency.
Analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of these two processors helps determine which best adapts to an organization's specific needs.
The EPYC 7351P offers more cores, the Xeon E-2288G more speed
Technical specifications of both processors
The AMD EPYC 7351P stands out with its 16 cores and 32 threads, offering impressive parallel processing capacity. Its base frequency is set at 2.4 GHz, with a boost that can reach 2.9 GHz.
On its side, the Intel Xeon E-2288G has 8 cores and 16 threads, but compensates with a higher base frequency at 3.7 GHz and a boost going up to 5.0 GHz.
Comparison of core count and frequencies
The following table summarizes the main characteristics of both processors:
| Characteristic | AMD EPYC 7351P | Intel Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| Number of cores | 16 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 32 | 16 |
| Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost frequency | 2.9 GHz | 5.0 GHz |
This design difference reflects the distinct strategies of AMD and Intel. AMD bets on multiplying cores to improve overall performance, while Intel favors higher frequencies to optimize single-core tasks.
Performance in multi-core tasks
Advantages of the EPYC 7351P for parallel computing
The EPYC 7351P excels in environments requiring intensive parallel processing. Its 16 cores allow simultaneous management of a large number of tasks, which is particularly advantageous for:
- Virtualization applications
- Large databases
- Complex scientific calculations
A study conducted by Stanford University's computer science research laboratory demonstrated that the EPYC 7351P surpassed the Xeon E-2288G by 35% on average in standardized multi-thread performance tests.
Use cases suited to the AMD processor
Scenarios where the EPYC 7351P particularly shines include:
- Hosting multiple virtual machines
- High-load web servers
- Big data processing
- 3D rendering and video encoding
To compare in detail the performance of these two processors in various tasks, consulting this comprehensive comparative analysis can prove very instructive.
Performance in single-core tasks
Superiority of the Xeon E-2288G in frequency
The Xeon E-2288G takes the advantage in applications requiring strong computing power on a single core. Its boost frequency of 5.0 GHz allows it to quickly execute complex sequential tasks.
This characteristic translates to:
- Better responsiveness in interactive applications
- Better performance for software not optimized for multi-threading
Applications benefiting from Intel's single-core power
Areas where the Xeon E-2288G shows particularly high performance include:
- Online gaming servers
- Low-latency financial applications
- Real-time industrial control systems
- Certain CAD/CAM software
A study conducted by the IDC analysis firm revealed that the Xeon E-2288G surpassed the EPYC 7351P by 22% on average in single-core performance benchmarks.
Energy consumption and efficiency
TDP and actual consumption of both processors
TDP (Thermal Design Power) indicates the maximum thermal dissipation that the cooling system must handle.
- The EPYC 7351P displays a TDP of 155W
- The Xeon E-2288G settles for 95W
However, actual consumption varies according to workload:
- Under heavy load, the EPYC 7351P can consume up to 180W
- The Xeon E-2288G reaches about 130W
Performance/watt ratio
The following table compares the energy efficiency of both processors:
| Metric | AMD EPYC 7351P | Intel Xeon E-2288G |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-thread performance / Watt | 0.18 points / Watt | 0.15 points / Watt |
| Single-thread performance / Watt | 0.016 points / Watt | 0.042 points / Watt |
These figures show that:
- The EPYC 7351P provides better energy efficiency for multi-thread tasks
- The Xeon E-2288G shows more efficiency in single-thread
Processor choice according to needs
Selection criteria for businesses
To determine the most suitable processor, businesses must consider several factors:
- Nature of applications to execute (multi-thread or single-thread)
- Expected workload and activity peaks
- Budget allocated to server infrastructure
- Energy costs and cooling constraints
- Future scalability of computing power needs
Recommendations according to use cases
-
For businesses managing numerous virtual machines or processing large volumes of data in parallel, the EPYC 7351P is often the most judicious choice. Its ability to efficiently manage multiple simultaneous tasks makes it an asset for cloud environments and high-density data centers.
-
On the other hand, organizations requiring strong responsiveness for single-thread applications, like certain gaming servers or high-frequency trading systems, will find in the Xeon E-2288G a choice ally. Its high frequency guarantees minimal response times for real-time critical tasks.